COVID-19 Restrictions Are Associated With a Significant Decrease of All Common Respiratory Viral Illnesses in Children.

To combat the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), significant measures were enacted including school and business closures, social distancing, and facial coverings. We hypothesized that this would have an impact on all respiratory infections in children. Using nasopharyngeal panel test results of children in the emergency department, we evaluated cross-sectional data from February to May in both 2019 and 2020. Respiratory panel testing included 11 common respiratory viruses and bacteria. After the restrictions were enacted, we observed a large drop in the number and percentage positive of all common respiratory viral infections in 2020 compared with the same time in 2019. When analyzing data from children <2 years old, a similar decrease was seen. Restrictions enacted to prevent the spread of COVID-19 were associated with a significant decrease in respiratory viral infections in children of all ages. This association could guide future public health recommendations and guidelines.

Finger counting: an alternative method for estimating pediatric weights.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the accuracy of a conceptually simple pediatric weight estimation technique, the finger counting method, with other commonly used methods. METHODS: We prospectively collected cross-sectional data on a convenience sample of 207 children aged 1 to 9 presenting to our pediatric emergency department. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to compare the finger counting method to the Broselow tape method, parental estimate, the Luscombe formula, and the advanced pediatric life support (APLS) formula. Proportions within 10% and 20% of measured weight were compared. RESULTS: Mean difference and range of agreement in kilograms for Bland-Altman plots were as follows: -1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3 to -1.3) and 15.4 (95% CI, 13.6-17.2) for the finger counting method; -1.4 (95% CI, -2.0 to -0.9) and 15.8 (95% CI, 13.9-17.6) for the Broselow method; -0.02 (95% CI, -0.53 to 0.49) and 14.8 (95% CI, 13-16.6) for parental estimate; 0.2 (95% CI, -0.33 to 0.72) and 15.3 (95% CI, 13.5-17.2) for the Luscombe formula; and -3.8 (95% CI, -4.4 to -3.2) and 17.2 (95% CI, 15.2-19.2) for the APLS formula. The finger counting method estimated weights within 10% in 59% of children (95% CI, 52%-65%) and within 20% in 87% of children (95% CI, 81%-91%). Proportions within 10% were similar for all methods, except the APLS method, which was lower. CONCLUSIONS: The finger counting method is an acceptable alternative to the Broselow method for weight estimation in children aged 1 to 9 years. It outperforms the traditional APLS method but underestimates weights compared with parental estimate and the Luscombe formula.